In late October 2024, the situation was completely distinct. Prior to the American presidential vote, reflective Americans could recognize the nation's significant faults – its unfairness and imbalance – yet they could still perceive it as America. A free society. A country where legal governance held significance. A state led by a honorable and decent official, notwithstanding his older age and growing weakness.
These days, this autumn, numerous citizens scarcely know the land we live in. People suspected of being undocumented migrants are rounded up and shoved into transport, at times blocked from fair treatment. The left side of the presidential residence – is being torn down for an obscene dance hall. The president is persecuting his opponents or perceived antagonists and requesting legal authorities transfer an enormous amount of citizen dollars. Armed military personnel are deployed across metropolitan centers under fabricated reasons. The Pentagon, relabeled the War Department, has effectively freed itself of routine media oversight while it uses what could amount to nearly $1tn from citizen taxes. Universities, law firms, media outlets are yielding from leader's menaces, and wealthy elites are regarded as members of the royal family.
“The United States, shortly prior to its quarter-millennium anniversary as the planet's foremost free society, has crossed the edge into authoritarianism and fascism,” an American historian, wrote in August. “In the end, more quickly than I believed likely, it did happen here.”
Every morning starts to new horrors. And it's challenging to understand – and agonizing to acknowledge – how severely declined we are, and the rapid pace with which it has happened.
However, we understand that the president was properly voted in. Even after his highly troubling initial presidency and despite the warnings that came with the awareness of Project 2025 – following the president personally declared plainly he would rule as a tyrant only on the first day – sufficient voters selected him rather than the other candidate.
While alarming as the current reality are, it’s even scarier to recognize that we are just nine months into this presidential term. What will three more years of this decline leave us? And suppose that timeframe transforms into an prolonged era, because there is not anyone to limit this leader from determining that additional tenure is required, perhaps for national security reasons?
Admittedly, not everything is hopeless. There are midterm elections the coming year that could establish an alternate political equilibrium, in case Democrats regain either chamber of parliament. We have elected officials who are attempting to exert certain responsibility, for example representatives that are initiating an inquiry into the attempted fund seizure by federal prosecutors.
And a leadership election three years from now could start us down the road toward restoration precisely as last year’s election placed us on this unfortunate course.
We see millions of Americans demonstrating in urban areas of their cities, like they performed recently during anti-authority protests.
An ex-cabinet member, commented this week that “the dormant powerhouse of the nation is stirring”, exactly as before post-McCarthyism in that decade or amid the Vietnam war protests or during the Watergate scandal.
During those times, the listing ship finally returned to balance.
He claims he knows the signals of that awakening and notices it unfolding at present. As evidence, he points to the recent massive protests, the widespread, cross-party resistance regarding a broadcaster's firing and the largely united refusal by journalists to sign government requirements they only publish authorized information.
“The sleeping giant perpetually exists asleep until certain corruption grows too toxic, a particular deed so offensive of the common good, some brutality so disruptive, that the giant is forced except to rise.”
It’s an optimistic take, and I respect Reich’s experienced view. Perhaps he will turn out correct.
In the meantime, the crucial issues persist: is the US able to ever recover? Can it reclaim its standing in the world and its adherence to the rule of law?
Or do we need to admit that the 250-year-old experiment functioned for a period, and then – swiftly, totally – ended?
My negative thoughts indicates that the second option is accurate; that everything could be finished. My hopeful heart, however, advises me that we need to strive, through all methods possible.
In my case, as an observer of the press, that’s about urging journalists to commit, more completely, to their mission of scrutinizing authority. For some people, it may be engaging with political races, or coordinating protests, or finding ways to safeguard voting rights.
Under twelve months back, we lived in a separate situation. In the future? Or after another term? The truth is, we are uncertain. The only option is to attempt to persevere.
The interaction I have with students with aspiring reporters, that are simultaneously visionary and grounded, {always
A passionate writer and creative enthusiast, sharing insights on art, design, and innovation to inspire others.